Red Dawn
A Movie Review
Let me start this off bluntly: Somehow Red Dawn is one of
the more subversive and surprising movies of the last 12 months.
In a year where slavery (Lincolon), terrorism/torture (Zero
Dark Thirty), Scientology (The Master), and East/West clashes (Argo) dominate
the discussion of film critics, a plucky little action remake somehow became
more honest and politically representative than any one of these
soon-to-be-Oscar-winners. I don’t know
how it happened, and I have no idea why this wasn’t discussed elsewhere, but
Red Dawn makes one of the most convincing arguments for Guerrilla warfare,
insurgency, and ‘terrorist’ tactics that I’ve ever seen in a big-budget
American film....or even small budget American film....or play....or news
report.
Before I get into what the film actually says, let’s
remember the source material they are working from. In 1984, at the height of Reagan’s ‘Morning
in America’, the original Red Dawn was released. Capitalizing on the Red Scare, this film
took viewers on a nationalistic romp that thinly masked its xenophobic message
in exploding cars and bullet-ridden Soviets.....and Nicaraguans (if I remember
correctly there were also Nicaraguans in this movie....as it was made during a
brief window when America was supposed to be afraid of a Sandinista
invasion....which no one was.)
When I sat down to watch the remake I expected exactly the
same movie, but substantially worse as it was a cheap remake. What I was presented with was anything but! Ok, they did have a totally unbelievable
enemy (in reality, Americans are as afraid of a North Korean invasion now as they
were of a Nicaraguan invasion in 1984), and there were plenty of schlocky
action sequences and over-wrought emotional breaks (and yes, there was
xenophobia, but it wasn’t the point this time).
So it’s not like I’m saying this movie is perfect, but what I am saying
is that the message of the movie was as follows:
-
1. ‘Terrorist’ and Guerrilla warfare tactics (car
bombs, attacks in civilian locations, small attacks followed by quick retreats
in an effort to gain supplies and ammo, etc.) work. In fact, they work VERY well.
-
2. In the long run, large conventional armies really
don’t stand a chance against dedicated home-grown insurgents.
-
3. The invasion of someone’s homeland will never be
seen as just by those being invaded.
-
4. Any group that is facing an invasion has a moral
imperative to resist the invaders.
Collaborators should be treated the same as enemy soldiers.
Now, if these messages were constantly accompanied by some
message of American exceptionalism then my review would be different, but they
weren’t. There really wasn’t much flag
waving at all (unlike the original), but instead there was a message that
guerrilla tactics and small, coordinated attacks against an invading army were
the moral imperative of civilians facing an invading army, regardless of their
motivations.
And no, I’m not reading into things. These are similar to statements made in the
movie. In the REMAKE OF RED DAWN. What the hell?!
Either way, it’s great and worth watching....and arguably
says something more fundamentally important about war and human nature than
anything that will win an Oscar this year.
Go figure.